As Chemezov gathered themselves "Russian Technologies»

By the end of the spring in Chelyabinsk NGO "Electromashina" was replaced by Director General. They became the manager of the "RT-car" Oleg Dobronogov - representative of the major shareholders of the company "Rostekhnologii", the Russian property and "Uralvagonzavod". And what is strange? The usual purpose. If you do not dig deeper. In 2007 the government decided to build on the basis of "Uralvagonzavod" armored holding. For this he was given 51% shares of "Electric" (among other things, designs and manufactures electrical equipment and control systems for armored vehicles). The remaining 49% were "Russian Technologies" as a material contribution. Everything is logical: the designated responsible strategist manages, monitors minority shareholder. But then "Electric" needed money for a program of technical re-equipment of up to 2015. At the beginning of 2011 the company had extra-emissions by 2 billion rubles to the state. The shares to existing shareholders declined, a new - Rosimushchestvo with 20.6% of the shares. Typically, the agency sends the packet immediately the parent organization, the more it owns 100% of "Uralvagonzavod". But this time the action "stuck." In the end, they voted for the Federal Property Management Agency designation "rostehovskogo" head on "Electric". "Russian Technologies" waged and won a power struggle for control over the enterprise. Lawyers have no doubt that will continue to run the scheme on which the SC will receive more shares in the "Electric" than a certain president of a leading enterprise "Uralvagonzavod". "100%" Electric "as well as for himself" Uralvagonzavod "corporation claimed in 2008, at the time of forming the list of assets transferred to it as a material contribution from the Russian Federation - the source says" F. "familiar with the situation. - But broke the governor of Sverdlovsk region, Eduard Rossel, and rescued the company. What is important is not even the fact of the struggle for the asset and the tools and the sequence - "Russian Technologies" always reach their. Sometimes even contrary to existing state policy. Although he himself is its instrument. " State secrets of the corporation. "Russian Technologies" appeared in 2007 and represented a conglomerate of companies from different sectors of the economy. Most of them were transferred from the "Rosoboron-export" as the material contribution of the Russian Federation. Total state has transferred under the wing of PT shares and units in 446 companies. By law, the corporation on the legal form are the NGOs, so that revenue for the "Russian Technologies" is not important. The Corporation has a different mission, described in a number of federal laws and regulations. The global plan is a consolidation of ownership in the holding companies in order to create effective operating structures. As well as promoting the development, production and export of high technology products by providing support for national development through attracting investment and so on. In other words, the usual functional management organization. These are the official figures on the "Russian Technologies". This top of the iceberg issue, entitled "State Corporation" Russian Technologies "in Russia's economy." Much of the eye is hidden, but something is not presented as they should. Take, for instance reporting "Russian Technologies". The developed "Rosoboron-export" the draft law on the corporation, which in October 2007 was submitted to the State Duma, stated: "Annual Report to the President of the corporation and the government until 1 May of the year following the reporting period, and will not be published." Deputies and Senators such reticence confused. They have made the amendments: the annual report is published in full, except the information constituting a state secret. Someone once. In the State Duma and Federation Council there were also other claims to the bill, including: - excessive supervisory powers in respect of economic agents who wish to take the "Russian Technologies" - questioned the beneficial effects produced by GC on market competition - the actual lack of accountability to the Government - the estimated low efficiency due to the monopoly status in some industries. Commented on - and accepted, especially since there was no reason not to take: at the same time create other corporation - Vnesheconombank, "Rosatom" Housing Reform Fund, "Olimpstroy", "RUSNANO". The idea of ​​state corporations during their existence has not kicked just lazy. And there's why. "I do not understand why such a strange shape - said Professor School of Economics, Chief Economist," Troika Dialog "Gavrilenkov. - SC were mixed outcome of the process that began in 2002-2003. Then the development should proceed in line with the dominant ideology must begin to diversify its economy, to structure, build, rebuild communication through nationalization. " With the functions entrusted to the corporation, has always coped departments and agencies. Also, it could do stock companies, 100% state-controlled. "One of the problems of state corporations - the privatization process. In fact, corporatization FSUE - function Rosimushchestvo, where all the assets and are, and it is in line with forecast plan of privatization ", - adds analyst Standard & Poor's Felix Eygel. Interviewed "F." experts agree that the use of traditional institutions and the subjects of management system to function would be easier and faster and probably safer. State corporations are laying between the legislative and executive authorities and economic actors. "Conventional hardware circuits that involve the manipulation of various forms of property, - said deputy director general of the political conjuncture Alexander Shatilov. - They exist in many countries, with varying degrees of success and corruption, expressing the interests of certain closed elites. "Russian Technologies" is no exception, here too there are the interests of specific groups of people having a direct relationship to power. " Say "Russian Technologies", we mean ... In this sense, without Chemezov would not be "Russian Technologies". It's bright representative of the group related to the MIC. And one of the objectives of the corporation and is the consolidation of defense companies. Its role in the emergence of "Russian Technologies" played friendly relations with Vladimir Putin, but not only. "Chemezov - the warehouse investor that aims for the future - says businessman familiar with it. - For example, he believes that the future for biofuels, and even put some money in this direction. But for some reason, it extended its influence to non-core for the "defense" assets that are not so innovative and sometimes in poor condition. " In spring 2009, Chemezov admitted that over a third of transferred HA management companies may go bankrupt, and lamented the crisis, which inhibits or even prevents the healing process. The desire for collecting a variety of assets, regardless of industry and quality evident when Chemezov in April 2004 headed "Rosoboronexport". Unitary enterprise almost immediately took an active part in the "quiet" nationalization "AvtoVAZ" after the departure of Vladimir Kadannikov to retire. And after a while put the question squarely before the Federal Property Management Agency to transfer the management of 34% shares of "KAMAZ" (later increased to 49.9%), which were supposed to put up for privatization tender. Then, at a discount to the market in 30% of Federal State Unitary Enterprise acquired a controlling holding in titanium Vladislav Tetyukhin and Vyacheslav Bresht "VSMPO-AVISMA." At the same time, "Rosoboron-export" rake up smaller companies. But the legal form of FSUE impose weight restrictions, including the amount of transactions in excess of 5 million rubles, the appointment of management and others. "To get rid of these barriers, it was enough to joint stock companies," Ros-oboroneksport "legalize it hanging on the minority and majority state blocks - one of the respondents commented on" F. "lawyers. - But then Chemezov not be able to take under her other assets not of defense. " The form allows the corporation to make decisions personally CEO about the transactions, the amount does not exceed 1% (approximately 3 billion) of total asset value (larger than approved by the Supervisory Board). Appointed head of the Civil Code only the president and accountable only to the senior management of the country. However, given the status of the Civil Code itself, "Rosoboronexport" has failed. State Corporation "assigned" a small unitary enterprise from the Federal State Unitary Enterprise - "Russian Technologies". The structure involved in the sale of licenses for the use of Russian military developments (in fact, sold everything that came to hand). The new Civil Code were finally transferred all assets, "Rosoboronexport" has remained as originally conceived and brokered arms export. Fail appetites. So there was little benefit to the body of the Russian economy. If the creation of "Rosatom" or "RUSNANO" (from March 11, 2011 transformed into joint-stock company) was a grain of truth, then "Russian Technologies", the same logic applies only to the defense assets. And with them they are managed well: what is only a recent attempt to "Helicopters of Russia" to break the London Stock Exchange, which failed only because of unfavorable market conditions. However, civilian Federal State Unitary Enterprise and companies in the "Russian Technologies" a lot. A low efficiency. What was actually done in nearly three years of existence? The question of evaluating the performance of "Ros-technology" is not idle, said Felix Eygel. With respect to NCB can not be assumed to maximize revenues, although subsequent amendments to the Law on NGOs state corporations were allowed to engage in commercial activity for profit. Hence, it is necessary to evaluate the quality of management regarding the timing and volume of completed tasks. "One of the main arguments Chemezov at creating a" Russian Technologies "was the thesis: the state very slowly in the reforms, the rate of incorporation is low, I'm with my team of professional managers will do everything quickly and efficiently," - says the top manager of one of the defense enterprises. However, since 2008, out of 182 passed the FSUE to date only 25 joint-stock company. And one of them was only half the necessary preparatory procedures. At the final meeting in October 2010 Chemezov justified by the fact that most businesses can not order the documentation and so difficult financial situation, which sometimes is not enough money to complete the process. Here are just a "Ros-atom", created simultaneously with the "Russian Technologies", back in 2009, he completed 100 joint-stock enterprises. When you create a "Oboronservisa" in July 2009, the Defense Ministry has received 268 federal state unitary enterprises, of which so far no joint-stock only 9. Although the quality of all of them, probably not much different from "rostehovskih." Slowly conducting corporatization "Ros-technology" risked not fit into allotted to the end of 2012 the period for which the property transferred to state corporations control. The matter was easily remedied: United Russia deputy, Alexander Khinshtein introduced a bill, under which terms a particular period of management shall be extended until I quarter of 2013. Thus, the "Russian Technologies" has already planned out in 2011, 90 joint stock companies owned unitary enterprises in 2012 - still 69. Schemers. "The second point, according to which Chemezov asked to give his assets, I gathered the managers who are better and faster than anyone can create a separate business from acting effectively on innovative principles of integrated structures," - said a top manager of the defense enterprise . Help really needed a competent managers of many organizations. It is in such a way "Russian Technologies" sought to consolidate aviaaktivy with state to create a second national carrier - a competitor, "Aero-Navy". The arguments were the same: we can not only restructure, but also to effectively manage the new global structure, which later received the provisional name "Rosavia". In May 2008, by presidential decree "Russian Technologies" were transferred to state stakes in "Domodedovo Airlines" (50.05% of shares), "Krasair" (51%) and "Samara" (46.5%). During the year, CC has received several state-packages. Basically it was a regional airline with a fleet of obsolete aircraft and a small number of passengers. Managers of the "Russian Technologies" have developed several concepts of association and the further development of the new structure after the sale of shares available will be a federal state unitary enterprises. According to them, it turned out that the new airline will be able to shut himself in his belt "Aeroflot". All this is doubly absurd project-mongering look at the background of the crisis, in which the carriers with their level of profitability at best 5% of victims were among the first. Gradually the talk about "Rosavia" disappeared. And in mid-May, the story of the bubble ended in agreements between the "Russian Technologies" and "Aero-Fleet" asset swap. Parties took a little over a year to finally settle the deal - about it in that format first began in early 2010. The national carrier agreed to take stakes in STC "Russia", FSUE "Kavminvodyavia" (completed the privatization process), "Orenburg Airlines", "Vladivostok Avia", "Saratov airlines" and "Sakhalin air routes" estimated value of 2, 5 billion rubles in exchange for 3.6% of its own shares. Resource for the car. Another example. The included "Ros-technology" company "Russpetsstal" at the end of May has been declared bankrupt. This company was assigned the role of the management structure of the holding of special steels and alloys for the needs of the defense industry, automotive and aviation. At the time of bankruptcy, it had only one productive asset - VSW "Red October". And the company is pledged to the VTB loan agreement. Accounts payable "Russpetsstali" is 6.06 billion rubles. With "AvtoVAZ" is the case a little better, which clearly emphasizes the management style "Russian Technologies". Automobile plant in a deep systemic crisis of long-needed help of competent managers. How come "Rosteh" succeeding "Rosoboronexport" management shares "AvtoVAZ"? With the onset of the crisis do not take other measures, except for mediation between the "AvtoVAZ" and the federal budget for grants for financial support to the automaker. Only in 2009, Togliatti plant has received 32 billion rubles-lei, who immediately "eaten" - they went to pay salaries and debts owed to banks. Even finding a strategic investor in the face of Renault-Nissan alliance is not going smoothly. Able to attract before, but Chemezov lost a lot of time courting the automaker's most popular format is not Peugeot. As a "Russian Technologies" earn. What constitutes the final income and profit after tax of RT (in 2010 the budget of 480.3 million rubles transferred)? Organization of international exhibitions and renting real estate, asset sales yielded a total of 245.5 million rubles. More charges brought on bank deposits - nearly 460 million rubles. Cash flow generated from grants, loans and other payments from the budget of companies that come to them not directly but through the accounts of "Rosteha." The highest income received HA in the form of dividends from the companies whose shares are in her control, and the profits from the federal state unitary enterprises - more than 1 billion rubles. Their enterprises "Russian Technologies" simply offer links to the government. The problems covered up than to cause serious harm. Not maliciously, of course. "In this economy, which is picked up by a" Russian Technologies ", effective management can not nobody, whether public or private structure - explains Gavrilenkov. - Not in terms of production, and by the breadth of this conglomerate exceeds all that is. This is a task-level ministries, and several. " Alexander Shatilov more categorical: "The effectiveness of any interest to the CC, including" Russian Technologies ", in terms of development of financial flows that can lobby through their representatives in government, - the expert concludes. - So often our innovative schemes do not work, it does not work fully in the form of points of increase of the same GC, SEZs, industrial parks, and other entities that were created under the innovative development of Russia. " Another reason for low efficiency of the voice source "F." in the defense enterprise, "This inability to live in a normal market conditions. Chemezov - official and scored in a corporation the same officials who think like marketers do not. " By the end of the spring in Chelyabinsk NGO "Electromashina" was replaced by Director General. They became the manager of the "RT-car" Oleg Dobronogov - representative of the major shareholders of the company "Rostekhnologii", the Russian property and "Uralvagonzavod". And what is strange? The usual purpose. If you do not dig deeper. In 2007 the government decided to build on the basis of "Uralvagonzavod" armored holding. For this he was given 51% shares of "Electric" (among other things, designs and manufactures electrical equipment and control systems for armored vehicles). The remaining 49% were "Russian Technologies" as a material contribution. Everything is logical: the designated responsible strategist manages, monitors minority shareholder. But then "Electric" needed money for a program of technical re-equipment of up to 2015. At the beginning of 2011 the company had extra-emissions by 2 billion rubles to the state. The shares to existing shareholders declined, a new - Rosimushchestvo with 20.6% of the shares. Typically, the agency sends the packet immediately the parent organization, the more it owns 100% of "Uralvagonzavod". But this time the action "stuck." In the end, they voted for the Federal Property Management Agency designation "rostehovskogo" head on "Electric". "Russian Technologies" waged and won a power struggle for control over the enterprise. Lawyers have no doubt that will continue to run the scheme on which the SC will receive more shares in the "Electric" than a certain president of a leading enterprise "Uralvagonzavod". "100%" Electric "as well as for himself" Uralvagonzavod "corporation claimed in 2008, at the time of forming the list of assets transferred to it as a material contribution from the Russian Federation - the source says" F. "familiar with the situation. - But broke the governor of Sverdlovsk region, Eduard Rossel, and rescued the company.

What is important is not even the fact of the struggle for the asset and the tools and the sequence - "Russian Technologies" always reach their. Sometimes even contrary to existing state policy. Although he himself is its instrument. " State secrets of the corporation. "Russian Technologies" appeared in 2007 and represented a conglomerate of companies from different sectors of the economy. Most of them were transferred from the "Rosoboron-export" as the material contribution of the Russian Federation. Total state has transferred under the wing of PT shares and units in 446 companies. By law, the corporation on the legal form are the NGOs, so that revenue for the "Russian Technologies" is not important. The Corporation has a different mission, described in a number of federal laws and regulations. The global plan is a consolidation of ownership in the holding companies in order to create effective operating structures. As well as promoting the development, production and export of high technology products by providing support for national development through attracting investment and so on. In other words, the usual functional management organization. These are the official figures on the "Russian Technologies". This top of the iceberg issue, entitled "State Corporation" Russian Technologies "in Russia's economy." Much of the eye is hidden, but something is not presented as they should. Take, for instance reporting "Russian Technologies". The developed "Rosoboron-export" the draft law on the corporation, which in October 2007 was submitted to the State Duma, stated: "Annual Report to the President of the corporation and the government until 1 May of the year following the reporting period, and will not be published." <<>> Deputies and Senators such reticence confused. They have made the amendments: the annual report is published in full, except the information constituting a state secret. Someone once. In the State Duma and Federation Council there were also other claims to the bill, including: - excessive supervisory powers in respect of economic agents who wish to take the "Russian Technologies" - questioned the beneficial effects produced by GC on market competition - the actual lack of accountability to the Government - the estimated low efficiency due to the monopoly status in some industries. Commented on - and accepted, especially since there was no reason not to take: at the same time create other corporation - Vnesheconombank, "Rosatom" Housing Reform Fund, "Olimpstroy", "RUSNANO". The idea of ​​state corporations during their existence has not kicked just lazy. And there's why. "I do not understand why such a strange shape - said Professor School of Economics, Chief Economist," Troika Dialog "Gavrilenkov. - SC were mixed outcome of the process that began in 2002-2003. Then the development should proceed in line with the dominant ideology must begin to diversify its economy, to structure, build, rebuild communication through nationalization. " With the functions entrusted to the corporation, has always coped departments and agencies. Also, it could do stock companies, 100% state-controlled. "One of the problems of state corporations - the privatization process. In fact, corporatization FSUE - function Rosimushchestvo, where all the assets and are, and it is in line with forecast plan of privatization ", - adds analyst Standard & Poor's Felix Eygel. <<>> Interviewed "F." experts agree that the use of traditional institutions and the subjects of management system to function would be easier and faster and probably safer. State corporations are laying between the legislative and executive authorities and economic actors. "Conventional hardware circuits that involve the manipulation of various forms of property, - said deputy director general of the political conjuncture Alexander Shatilov. - They exist in many countries, with varying degrees of success and corruption, expressing the interests of certain closed elites. "Russian Technologies" is no exception, here too there are the interests of specific groups of people having a direct relationship to power. " Say "Russian Technologies", we mean ... In this sense, without Chemezov would not be "Russian Technologies". It's bright representative of the group related to the MIC. And one of the objectives of the corporation and is the consolidation of defense companies. Its role in the emergence of "Russian Technologies" played friendly relations with Vladimir Putin, but not only. "Chemezov - the warehouse investor that aims for the future - says businessman familiar with it. - For example, he believes that the future for biofuels, and even put some money in this direction. But for some reason, it extended its influence to non-core for the "defense" assets that are not so innovative and sometimes in poor condition. " In spring 2009, Chemezov admitted that over a third of transferred HA management companies may go bankrupt, and lamented the crisis, which inhibits or even prevents the healing process. <<>> The desire for collecting a variety of assets, regardless of industry and quality evident when Chemezov in April 2004 headed "Rosoboronexport". Unitary enterprise almost immediately took an active part in the "quiet" nationalization "AvtoVAZ" after the departure of Vladimir Kadannikov to retire. And after a while put the question squarely before the Federal Property Management Agency to transfer the management of 34% shares of "KAMAZ" (later increased to 49.9%), which were supposed to put up for privatization tender. Then, at a discount to the market in 30% of Federal State Unitary Enterprise acquired a controlling holding in titanium Vladislav Tetyukhin and Vyacheslav Bresht "VSMPO-AVISMA." At the same time, "Rosoboron-export" rake up smaller companies. But the legal form of FSUE impose weight restrictions, including the amount of transactions in excess of 5 million rubles, the appointment of management and others. "To get rid of these barriers, it was enough to joint stock companies," Ros-oboroneksport "legalize it hanging on the minority and majority state blocks - one of the respondents commented on" F. "lawyers. - But then Chemezov not be able to take under her other assets not of defense. " The form allows the corporation to make decisions personally CEO about the transactions, the amount does not exceed 1% (approximately 3 billion) of total asset value (larger than approved by the Supervisory Board). Appointed head of the Civil Code only the president and accountable only to the senior management of the country. However, given the status of the Civil Code itself, "Rosoboronexport" has failed. <<>> State Corporation "assigned" a small unitary enterprise from the Federal State Unitary Enterprise - "Russian Technologies". The structure involved in the sale of licenses for the use of Russian military developments (in fact, sold everything that came to hand). The new Civil Code were finally transferred all assets, "Rosoboronexport" has remained as originally conceived and brokered arms export. Fail appetites. So there was little benefit to the body of the Russian economy. If the creation of "Rosatom" or "RUSNANO" (from March 11, 2011 transformed into joint-stock company) was a grain of truth, then "Russian Technologies", the same logic applies only to the defense assets. And with them they are managed well: what is only a recent attempt to "Helicopters of Russia" to break the London Stock Exchange, which failed only because of unfavorable market conditions. However, civilian Federal State Unitary Enterprise and companies in the "Russian Technologies" a lot. A low efficiency. What was actually done in nearly three years of existence? The question of evaluating the performance of "Ros-technology" is not idle, said Felix Eygel. With respect to NCB can not be assumed to maximize revenues, although subsequent amendments to the Law on NGOs state corporations were allowed to engage in commercial activity for profit. Hence, it is necessary to evaluate the quality of management regarding the timing and volume of completed tasks. "One of the main arguments Chemezov at creating a" Russian Technologies "was the thesis: the state very slowly in the reforms, the rate of incorporation is low, I'm with my team of professional managers will do everything quickly and efficiently," - says the top manager of one of the defense enterprises. <<>> However, since 2008, out of 182 passed the FSUE to date only 25 joint-stock company. And one of them was only half the necessary preparatory procedures. At the final meeting in October 2010 Chemezov justified by the fact that most businesses can not order the documentation and so difficult financial situation, which sometimes is not enough money to complete the process. Here are just a "Ros-atom", created simultaneously with the "Russian Technologies", back in 2009, he completed 100 joint-stock enterprises. When you create a "Oboronservisa" in July 2009, the Defense Ministry has received 268 federal state unitary enterprises, of which so far no joint-stock only 9. Although the quality of all of them, probably not much different from "rostehovskih." Slowly conducting corporatization "Ros-technology" risked not fit into allotted to the end of 2012 the period for which the property transferred to state corporations control. The matter was easily remedied: United Russia deputy, Alexander Khinshtein introduced a bill, under which terms a particular period of management shall be extended until I quarter of 2013. Thus, the "Russian Technologies" has already planned out in 2011, 90 joint stock companies owned unitary enterprises in 2012 - still 69. Schemers. "The second point, according to which Chemezov asked to give his assets, I gathered the managers who are better and faster than anyone can create a separate business from acting effectively on innovative principles of integrated structures," - said a top manager of the defense enterprise . <<>> Help really needed a competent managers of many organizations. It is in such a way "Russian Technologies" sought to consolidate aviaaktivy with state to create a second national carrier - a competitor, "Aero-Navy". The arguments were the same: we can not only restructure, but also to effectively manage the new global structure, which later received the provisional name "Rosavia". In May 2008, by presidential decree "Russian Technologies" were transferred to state stakes in "Domodedovo Airlines" (50.05% of shares), "Krasair" (51%) and "Samara" (46.5%). During the year, CC has received several state-packages. Basically it was a regional airline with a fleet of obsolete aircraft and a small number of passengers. Managers of the "Russian Technologies" have developed several concepts of association and the further development of the new structure after the sale of shares available will be a federal state unitary enterprises. According to them, it turned out that the new airline will be able to shut himself in his belt "Aeroflot". All this is doubly absurd project-mongering look at the background of the crisis, in which the carriers with their level of profitability at best 5% of victims were among the first. Gradually the talk about "Rosavia" disappeared. And in mid-May, the story of the bubble ended in agreements between the "Russian Technologies" and "Aero-Fleet" asset swap. Parties took a little over a year to finally settle the deal - about it in that format first began in early 2010. <<>> The national carrier agreed to take stakes in STC "Russia", FSUE "Kavminvodyavia" (completed the privatization process), "Orenburg Airlines", "Vladivostok Avia", "Saratov airlines" and "Sakhalin air routes" estimated value of 2, 5 billion rubles in exchange for 3.6% of its own shares. Resource for the car. Another example. The included "Ros-technology" company "Russpetsstal" at the end of May has been declared bankrupt. This company was assigned the role of the management structure of the holding of special steels and alloys for the needs of the defense industry, automotive and aviation. At the time of bankruptcy, it had only one productive asset - VSW "Red October". And the company is pledged to the VTB loan agreement. Accounts payable "Russpetsstali" is 6.06 billion rubles. With "AvtoVAZ" is the case a little better, which clearly emphasizes the management style "Russian Technologies". Automobile plant in a deep systemic crisis of long-needed help of competent managers. How come "Rosteh" succeeding "Rosoboronexport" management shares "AvtoVAZ"? With the onset of the crisis do not take other measures, except for mediation between the "AvtoVAZ" and the federal budget for grants for financial support to the automaker. Only in 2009, Togliatti plant has received 32 billion rubles-lei, who immediately "eaten" - they went to pay salaries and debts owed to banks. Even finding a strategic investor in the face of Renault-Nissan alliance is not going smoothly. Able to attract before, but Chemezov lost a lot of time courting the automaker's most popular format is not Peugeot. <<>> As a "Russian Technologies" earn. What constitutes the final income and profit after tax of RT (in 2010 the budget of 480.3 million rubles transferred)? Organization of international exhibitions and renting real estate, asset sales yielded a total of 245.5 million rubles. More charges brought on bank deposits - nearly 460 million rubles. Cash flow generated from grants, loans and other payments from the budget of companies that come to them not directly but through the accounts of "Rosteha." The highest income received HA in the form of dividends from the companies whose shares are in her control, and the profits from the federal state unitary enterprises - more than 1 billion rubles. Their enterprises "Russian Technologies" simply offer links to the government. The problems covered up than to cause serious harm. Not maliciously, of course. "In this economy, which is picked up by a" Russian Technologies ", effective management can not nobody, whether public or private structure - explains Gavrilenkov. - Not in terms of production, and by the breadth of this conglomerate exceeds all that is. This is a task-level ministries, and several. " Alexander Shatilov more categorical: "The effectiveness of any interest to the CC, including" Russian Technologies ", in terms of development of financial flows that can lobby through their representatives in government, - the expert concludes. - So often our innovative schemes do not work, it does not work fully in the form of points of increase of the same GC, SEZs, industrial parks, and other entities that were created under the innovative development of Russia. " <<>> Another reason for low efficiency of the voice source "F." in the defense enterprise, "This inability to live in a normal market conditions. Chemezov - official and scored in a corporation the same officials who think like marketers do not. " 22.12.2005 Decision of the Extraordinary Board of Directors of "AvtoVAZ" 61.5% of the shares under the control of "Rosoboronexport" and its affiliated entities. 10-11.2006 "Rosoboronexport" has consolidated 66% of "VSMPO-AVISMA," paying about $ 1 billion, money was borrowed from state banks secured redeemable securities. 11/23/2007 Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a federal law establishing a "Rostekhnologii". 08.12.2007 "Russian Technologies" at the conclusion of mediated agreements to acquire autoconcern Renault as a strategic investor of 25% + 1 share "AvtoVAZ". 07/10/2008 Decree of President Dmitry Medvedev's "Russian Technologies" assets were transferred to 426 companies. 05.08.2008 Contract with Italian Pirelli to launch in 2010 in Togliatti plant for the production of automobile tires investment worth 250 million euros. 21.10.2008 Together with the Moscow government was established airline "Rosavia". It includes regional companies passed the Civil Code as property contribution of the Russian Federation. 07/11/2008 Agreement with Italy's Finmeccanica to work together on creating a number of joint venture for the production of components made of composites. 11.11.2008 "Russian Technologies" have acquired a 25% stake in WiMax Holding Limited. Offshore owns operator "Scartel" brand Yota, providing broadband services. 10-12.12.2008 carmaker Daimler acquired 10% shares of "Kamaz" for $ 250 million and has signed a strategic partnership agreement with the company, "Russian Technologies" and the "Troika Dialog". 19.12.2008 General Director of NPO "Saturn" Yuri Lastochkin sold 48.76% of "Mekom Suite" and "Praymliteks" affiliated with "Oboronprom", estimated at 1.6 billion rubles. 10.2009 Signing of the Declaration of Intent with FIAT. <<>> On the basis of March 22 was set up joint venture to produce agricultural and construction equipment. 27/11/2009 Agreement on a joint venture Alcatel-Lucent RT. In May 2010, was introduced product - IP / MPLS router. 04/30/2010 Supervisory Board of "Russian Technologies" approved the acquisition of 12.12% shares of "Kamaz" from the "Troika Dialog" estimated at $ 303 million in loans that were involved in state-owned banks. 05.2010 Agreement with the Italian Beretta a joint venture on production of small arms. Production was to be launched in the I quarter. 2011. 26/11/2010 "Rosteh», Pirelli and "Sibur" signed a memorandum of understanding. Prior to June 2011 should be set up two joint venture to manufacture automobile tires. 03.03.2011 As a result of an agreement on equal access to infrastructure to mobile network 4G Yota group for the "Big Three" share "Rosteha" in Scartel drop to 20%. 05/11/2011 In the State Duma a bill to amend the law on "Russian Technologies" amendments that extend up to March 31, 2013 special period property management fee of the Russian Federation. 05/19/2011 Approval of "Aeroflot" exchange scheme shares in the 6 airlines by 3.6% stake in national carrier, $ 2.5 billion. 19.05.2011 Moscow Arbitration Court declared a bankrupt company "Russpetsstal" around which Rosteh intended to form the holding of special steels and alloys.